Which statement about the motion to reconsider is FALSE?

Which statement about the motion to reconsider is FALSE?

• A. It is debatable if the original motion is debatable
• B. A second is required
• C. It is undependable
• D. It can be reconsidered

Answer: (D)

The statement that is false regarding the motion to reconsider is that it can be reconsidered. In parliamentary procedure, the motion to reconsider is used to bring a motion back before the assembly for another vote after it has been decided. However, once a motion has been reconsidered and the assembly has made a new decision, it cannot be reconsidered again. This is to maintain a clear and orderly process in discussions and decision-making. The other statements about the motion to reconsider are accurate. It is debatable if the original motion is debatable, which means that if the original motion had debate, the motion to reconsider also allows for debate. A second is required for the motion to be considered, which means that another member must support the motion before it can advance. Lastly, describing the motion as undependable refers to the fact that it can be seen as somewhat unreliable, as it depends on the will of the assembly at the time of reconsideration. It’s important to understand these dynamics to effectively navigate parliamentary procedures within FFA meetings.

The statement that is false regarding the motion to reconsider is that it can be reconsidered. In parliamentary procedure, the motion to reconsider is used to bring a motion back before the assembly for another vote after it has been decided. However, once a motion has been reconsidered and the assembly has made a new decision, it cannot be reconsidered again. This is to maintain a clear and orderly process in discussions and decision-making.

The other statements about the motion to reconsider are accurate. It is debatable if the original motion is debatable, which means that if the original motion had debate, the motion to reconsider also allows for debate. A second is required for the motion to be considered, which means that another member must support the motion before it can advance. Lastly, describing the motion as undependable refers to the fact that it can be seen as somewhat unreliable, as it depends on the will of the assembly at the time of reconsideration. It’s important to understand these dynamics to effectively navigate parliamentary procedures within FFA meetings.